Key points in this article
We take the awkward parts
Renewals are not won on price. They are won when the property company's workload goes down and stays down. In practice that means four commitments, and the ones that matter most are the least visible.
We fund the build
Construction is funded by us, with the property company providing the site and coordination. Up-front capital is the most common reason a charging project stalls, and removing it is usually what gets a project started. The structure is described on the partnership page.
We own the maintenance
Inspection, spares and repair sit with our team, not with site staff who already have a full job. This is the commitment that is easiest to promise and easiest to abandon, which is why we write response times into the contract. Details are on the service page.
We keep the accounts visible
Every order, inspection and settlement is recorded on the platform and available to the property company at any time. Nobody has to take a number on trust, and month-end reconciliation stops being an exercise. Transparency is cheap for us and valuable to both sides.
We carry the risk
- Equipment verification and inspection records maintained
- Pricing published at the shelter and visible in the app
- Order and alarm history retained and retrievable
- A named accountable party when something goes wrong
The longer view
We would rather build fewer sites that still work in five years than many that do not. That preference shapes how we specify equipment, how we plan capacity and how we staff maintenance, and it is the reason most of our partnerships renew.
If you are weighing options, start with the case studies and the partnership model, then talk to us about your specific site.