Key points in this article
One list, many sites
A single shared checklist lets different sites be compared honestly. Without it, every location reports good and means something different. Keep the list to observable points: sheath, connector, environment, fit. Same items, same order, so two rounds are truly comparable.
Compare across time
Reading one site's lists over weeks shows drift before failure. Comparing sites shows which practice works, turning experience into proof. A checklist that finds faults but triggers no action is theater. Each flagged item needs an owner and a date, or the list is decoration.
Field use
Dongshang New Energy runs the same checklist everywhere, so a problem in one district is a lesson the others can apply the same week. One shared list lets sites be compared honestly and a problem in one district becomes a lesson the others apply the same week. Act on findings or the list is only decoration. The same items in the same order are what turn scattered experience into proof that travels between teams.